in a statutory cause of action to establish his paternity respecting Jane's child, X. On behalf of Jane Doe and itself, the State sued Willie Lavan, Jr.Rather, it allowed a paternity suit with respect to any "child who is not the legitimate child of a man." Go to Moreover, in S.C.V., the version of § 13.01 effective at the time of trial did not exclude cases in which the child has a presumed father. In the present case, John Doe has been joined in the suit, and § 12.06(a) controls. In S.C.V., Justice Spears stated that § 12.06 did not apply because the petitioner mother had not joined the presumed father as a party to the suit. 1988), in which the Texas Supreme Court allowed blood-test evidence to disprove the paternity of the presumed father in a Chapter 13 suit brought by the mother against another man she alleged was the biological father of her child. The present case is distinguishable from In the Interest of S.C.V., 750 S.W.2d 762 (Tex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |